Margaret Sanger promoted birth control as the path to eliminating minorities and the disabled to clean up the gene pool. Planned Parenthood, her legacy, jumped on abortion as a means to accomplish this goal.
That isn’t hyperbole. It is just a fact. Mike Wallace called her a hero. The entire Democratic Party turned her into a saint and has poured tens of billions into Planned Parenthood to accomplish that goal. And now Colorado Democrats are openly justifying their plan to subsidize abortions for the poor because, well, poor kids are expensive to the state.
2/ Let me break down what’s happening:
– New bill (SB 25-183) to force Medicaid to cover abortions
– Claims it’ll “save” $550K annually
– They’re literally calling dead babies “averted births”THIS IS NOT A JOKE.https://t.co/ET6TYhtLvh
— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) April 4, 2025
Usually, abortion proponents twist themselves into knots talking about autonomy, preventing “forced births,” female empowerment, and all the rest of the BS they use to justify their bloodthirsty policies. But the fact is that more Black ba
But they appear to be abandoning that gauzy rhetoric and getting down to brass tacks: the poor suck, and we need fewer of them. How are we going to afford high-speed rail and interpretive dances depicting the beauty of gangland violence if we don’t start killing the poor? Kill the babies and euthanize the infirm so funds will be freed up for better things that the AWFLs like.
4/ 🚨 IMPORTANT CONTEXT: Colorado passed Amendment 79 in 2024 making abortion a “constitutional right”
This new bill is Phase 2: Making YOU pay for it with YOUR tax dollars pic.twitter.com/Avku6sajQi
— Rod D. Martin (@RodDMartin) April 4, 2025
It’s hard to call this line of argument–it’s fiscally sound policy to kill babies before they are born–is driven by anything other than a justification of eugenics using the argument that poor people are expensive, so their numbers should be reduced. And the poor people in question are usually black, so it is hardly a stretch to call this “systemically racist.”
I’m not trying to use a “gotcha” argument here. Blacks and other minorities are more likely to be on Medicaid than whites–that is just a fact–and this bill is intended to reduce the number of Medicaid-eligible babies.
I’m not sure that “it’s just about the money, not the race” is very convincing.
With that said, I’m pretty sure that the proponents themselves aren’t thinking mostly in terms of race. Killing black and brown people through abortion is just one of their projects. They also are very much in favor of sterilizing and mutilating white children, who are disproportionately likely to proclaim themselves “trans.” And they seem happy to see white executives killed, too.
So perhaps this is less about race than just killing off everyone they dislike or find unpleasant. The only group they seem to genuinely like are AWFLs. A few brown people are good to have around to maintain the lawns, clean the houses, and worship them.
Otherwise, they believe humanity sucks, and Gaia and the AWFLs who should inherit the Earth are better off without more of us.
